The role of Local Ecological Knowledge on the Behavioral Ecology of mammals

Authors

  • Tamires Maria Silva Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
  • María Fernanda De la Fuente Laboratory of Theoretical and Applied Ethology (LETA), Department of Biology, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco
  • Antonio Souto Laboratory of Ethology (LabEt), Department of Zoology, Federal University of Pernambuco
  • Nicola Schiel Laboratory of Theoretical and Applied Ethology (LETA), Department of Biology, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2026-04-15-09-1-16

Keywords:

Ethnozoology, Caatinga, Mammals, Free list, Local Community

Abstract

While the role of Local Ecological Knowledge (LEK) is widely recognized for its dialogue and complement in ecology and conservation contexts, its role on the behavioral ecology of mammals is still unknown. With that in mind, we investigated LEK on the behavioral ecology of mammals, and which variables could influence such knowledge. The study was carried out in the municipality of Cabaceiras, state of Paraíba, Brazil. Data collection was divided into two stages: (i) free list (192 interviewees), to identify the mammals known in the region; (ii) and semi-structured interviews (150 interviewees). We found that conspicuous behaviors were significantly more familiar than cryptic ones, and higher LEK by residents with a rural occupation, who lives longer in the locality and encounters animals more frequently.  Thus, when considering LEK on the behavioral ecology of mammals, it is important to recognize that its contribution occurs, to a greater degree, in relation to more visible behaviors and the informants more contact. LEK emerges as a complementary source of information, optimizing data collection efforts and strengthening the inclusion of local knowledge in conservation strategies. Furthermore, considering in the future bridging LEK and Behavioral Ecology of mammals would lead to a two-way street that can promote a more equitable approach between these two knowledge systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afriyie JO, Asare MO (2020) Use of Local Ecological Knowledge to detect de-clines in mammal abundance in Kogyae Strict Nature Reserve, Ghana. Envi-ronmental Management 66:997–1011. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-020-01372-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01372-8

Albuquerque UP, Cunha LVFC, Lucena RFP, Alves RRN (2014) Methods and tech-niques in ethnobiology and ethnoecology. Humana Press, Springer Protocols, p. 1–37/199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8636-7

Albuquerque UP, Ludwig D, Feitosa IS, Moura JMB, Golçalves PHS, Silva RH, Silva TC, Golçalves-Souza T, Ferreira-Júnior WS (2021) Integrating traditional ecologi-cal knowledge into academic research at local and global scales. Regional Envi-ronmental Change 21(45):1–11. DOI: 10.1007/s10113-021-01774-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-021-01774-2

Alves RRN, Gonçalves MBR, Vieira LS (2012) Hunting, use and conservation of vertebrates in the Brazilian semi-arid region. Tropical Conservation Science 5(3):394–416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291200500312

Alves RRN, Lopes SF (2018) The role of ethnozoology in animal studies. In: Alves RRN, Albuquerque UP (orgs.) Ethnozoology: Animals in Our Lives, 1st ed. Elsevier, p. 467–479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809913-1.00024-7

Ballantyne R, Packer J (2016) Visitors' Perceptions of the Conservation Educa-tion Role of Zoos and Aquariums: Implications for the Provision of Learning Experiences. Visitor Studies 19(2):193–210. doi:10.1080/10645578.2016.1220185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2016.1220185

Berkes F (1993) Traditional ecological knowledge in perspective. In: Inglis JT (ed) Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Concepts and Cases, 1st ed. International Program on Traditional Ecological Knowledge/IDRC, pp. 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315114644-1

Borgatti SP, Halgin DS (2013) Elicitation techniques for cultural domain analy-sis. In: Schensul JJ, Lecompte MD (eds) Specialized Ethnographic Methods: A Mixed Methods Approach. AltaMira Press, Lanham, p. 80–116.

Borges AKM, Adams VM, Alves RRN, Oliveira TPR (2025) Integrating local eco-logical knowledge into systematic conservation planning for seahorse conser-vation. Conservation Biology 39: e70027. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.70027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70027

Camino M, Thompson J, Andrade L, Cortez S, Matteucci SD, Altrichter M (2020) Us-ing local ecological knowledge to improve large terrestrial mammal surveys, build local capacity and increase conservation opportunities. Biological Conser-vation 244:108450, 1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108450

Chaves LS, Nascimento ALB, Albuquerque UP (2019) What matters in free list-ing? A probabilistic interpretation of the Salience Index. Acta Botanica Brasilica 33(2):360–369. DOI: 10.1590/0102-33062018abb0330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062018abb0330

Chaves LS, Alves REN, Albuquerque UP (2020) Hunters' preferences and percep-tions as hunting predictors in a semiarid ecosystem. Science of the Total Envi-ronment 726. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138494

Danchin É, Cézilly F, Giraldeau L-A (2007) Fundamental concepts in behavioral ecology. In: Danchin É, Giraldeau L-A, Cézilly F (eds) Behavioural Ecology: An Evo-lutionary Perspective on Behaviour. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Ewart HE, Pasqualotto N, Paolino RM, Jensen K, Chiarello AG (2024) Effects of an-thropogenic disturbance and land cover protection on the behavioural patterns and abundance of Brazilian mammals. Global Ecology and Conservation 50:E02839. DOI:10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e02839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e02839

Fashing P, Nguyen N, Demissew S, Gizaw A, Atickem A, Mekonnen A, Nurmi NO, Kerby JT, Stenseth NC (2022) Ecology, evolution, and conservation of Ethio-pia’s Biodiversity. PNAS 119(50). DOI:10.1073/pnas.2206635119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2206635119

Freire-Filho R, Pinto T, Bezerra BM (2018) Using local ecological knowledge to access the distribution of the Endangered Caatinga howler monkey (Alouatta ululata). Ethnobiology and Conservation 7:10. DOI: 10.15451/ec2018-08-7.10-1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2018-08-7.10-1-22

Gandolfo ES, Hanazaki N (2014) Distribution of local plant knowledge in a re-cently urbanized area (Campeche District, Florianópolis, Brazil). Urban Ecosys-tems 17:775–785. DOI:10.1007/s11252-014-0345-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0345-4

IBGE (2022) Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística | v4.4.13 [online]. Availa-ble via [https://www.ibge.gov.br/cidades-e-estados/pb/cabaceiras.html] Accessed 05 September 2025.

Krebs JR, Davies NB (1996) An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology, 3rd ed. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

Koning BB, Tabbers HK (2011) Facilitating understanding of movements in dy-namic visualizations: an embodied perspective. Educational Psychology Review 23:501–521. DOI:10.1007/s10648-011-9173-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9173-8

Lima MSP, Lins-Oliveira JE, Nóbrega MF, Lopes PFM (2017) The use of Local Ecological Knowledge as a complementary approach to understand the tem-poral and spatial patterns of fishery resources distribution. Journal of Ethnobi-ology and Ethnomedicine 13:30, 1–12. DOI: 10.1186/s13002-017-0156-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-017-0156-9

Loiseau N, Mouquet N, Casajus N, Grenié M, Guéguen M, Maitner B, Mouillot D, Ostling A, Renaud J, Tucker C, Velez L, Thuiller W, Violle C (2020) Global distribu-tion and conservation status of ecologically rare mammal and bird species. Nature Communications 11:5071. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18779-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18779-w

Marske KA, Lanier HC, Siler CD, Rowe AH, Stein LR (2023) Integrating biogeogra-phy and behavioral ecology to rapidly address biodiversity loss. PNAS 120(15). DOI:10.1073/pnas.2110866120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2110866120

Passos-Filho PB, Chaves LS, Carvalho RA, Alves PP, Assunção MM, Prado-Neto JG (2015) Illustrated fauna in Fazenda Tamanduá. Ed. Avis Brasilis, 1ª ed., p. 310–341.

Reibelt LM, Woolaver L, Moser G, Randriamalala IH, Raveloarimalala LM, Ralainaso-lo FB, Ratsimbazafy J, Waeber PO (2017) Contact Matters: Local People’s Per-ceptions of Hapalemur alaotrensis and Implications for Conservation. Interna-tional Journal of Primatology 38:588–608. DOI: 10.1007/s10764-017-9969-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-017-9969-6

Ritzel K, Gallo T (2020) Behavior Change in Urban Mammals: A Systematic Re-view. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 8:576665. DOI:10.3389/fevo.2020.576665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.576665

Sampaio MB, De La Fuente MF, Albuquerque UP, Souto AS, Schiel N (2018) Con-tact with urban forests greatly enhances children's knowledge of faunal diver-sity. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 30:56–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.01.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.01.006

Silvano RAM, Begossi A (2002) Ethnoichthyology and fish conservation in the Piracicaba river (Brazil). Journal of Ethnobiology 22(2):285–306.

Simo F, Fopa GD, Kekeunou S, Ichu IG, Ebong LE, Olson D, Ingram DJ (2020) Us-ing local ecological knowledge to improve the effectiveness of detecting white-bellied pangolins (Phataginus tricuspis) using camera traps: A case study from Deng-Deng National Park, Cameroon. African Journal of Ecology, 1–6. DOI: 10.1111/aje.12762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aje.12762

Smith J (1993) Using ANTHOPAC 3.5 and a spreadsheet to compute a free-list Salience Index. Cultural Anthropology Methods 5:1–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X9300500301

Sousa J, Vicente L, Gippoliti S, Casanova C, Sousa C (2014) Local knowledge and perceptions of chimpanzees in Cantanhez National Park, Guinea-Bissau. Amer-ican Journal of Primatology 76(2):122–134. DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22215

Torrents-Ticó M, Fernández-Llamazares A, Burgar D, Cabeza M (2021) Conver-gences and divergences between scientific and Indigenous and Local Knowledge contribute to inform carnivore conservation. Ambio 50:990–1002. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-020-01443-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01443-4

Torres-Junior EU, Valença-Montenegro MM, Castro CSS (2016) Local Ecological Knowledge about Endangered Primates in a Rural Community in Paraíba, Bra-zil. Folia Primatologica 87(4):262–277. DOI: 10.1159/000452406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000452406

Torres-Avilez WM, Nascimento ALB, Campos LZO, Silva FSS, Albuquerque UP (2018) Gênero e Idade. In: Albuquerque UP, Alves RRN (eds) Introdução à Etnobio-logia, 2nd ed. NUPEEA, p. 249–255.

Turvey ST, Bryant JV, Duncan C, Wong MHG, Guan Z, Fei H, Ma C, Hong X et al. (2016) How many remnant gibbon populations are left on Hainan? Testing the use of local ecological knowledge to detect cryptic threatened primates. Amer-ican Journal of Primatology 79:e22593. DOI:10.1002/ajp.22593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22593

Zhang L, Guan Z, Fei H, Yan L, Turvey ST, Fan P (2020) Influence of traditional ecological knowledge on conservation of the skywalker hoolock gibbon (Hoolock tianxing) outside nature reserves. Biological Conservation 241:1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108267

Downloads

Published

04/11/2026

Issue

Section

Original research article

How to Cite

Silva, T. M., De la Fuente, M. F. ., Souto, A. ., & Schiel, N. (2026). The role of Local Ecological Knowledge on the Behavioral Ecology of mammals. Ethnobiology and Conservation, 15. https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2026-04-15-09-1-16

Similar Articles

31-40 of 179

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)