Ethnozoology in the mountains. What does the cognitive salience of wild animals tell us?

Authors

  • Matias Wajner independent biologist
  • Daniela Tamburini Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas y Tecnológicas IIBYT, (CONICET UNC), CERNAR - FCEFyN UNC. Av. Vélez Sarsfield 1611. Córdoba
  • Fernando Zamudio Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC)-CONICET

Keywords:

Cognitive approach, Ethnobiology, Animal perceptions, Human–wildlife conflict

Abstract

In recent times, ethnobiology has revived interest in cognitive aspects of humans’ communities. A concept commonly used in this area is cognitive salience. In this paper we assess the wild animal salience meaning for the rural people from an area of the mountain range of the Córdoba province (Argentina). We also analyzed the relationship of cultural and ecological factors over wild animal domain salience. The values of cognitive salience, perception and cultural value were obtained by means of free lists to 16 collaborators, while semi-structured interviews were used to inquire about local ecological knowledge and ease of observation about wild animals. The interdependence between the five variables elaborated was analyzed through a Principal Components Regression. The results show a qualitative relationship between Cognitive Salience and Cultural Value and a significant correlation between Cognitive Salience and Local Ecological Knowledge. Ease of Observation did not correlate with Cognitive Salience, but show a significant relationship with the Perceived Abundance. The results suggest a complex network of factors that are modeling the cognitive salience and local perceptions over wild animals. In our findings, highlight the Cultural Value given to harmful animals which reflects an increasing pattern in the region, the conflict between rural people and wild animals. In turn a mutual influences and causal feedback loops between cognitive salience and an ecological factor, the Perceived abundance, is proposed. Investigations over cognition and about how people perceived nature can give us an idea of how they act in it, a compelling factor when it comes to cultural and biological conservation issues.

Author Biography

Fernando Zamudio, Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC)-CONICET

Group of Ecological Interactions and Conservation. Assistant researcher of the National Council of scientific and technical research

References

Atran S, Medin D, Ross N, Lynch E, Vapnarsky V, Ek E, Coley J, Timura C, Haenn N (2002) Folkecology, Cultural Epidemiology, and the Spirit of the Commons: A Garden Experiment in the Maya Lowlands, 1991-2001.Current anthropology 43(3):421-450

Balée W, Nolan J (2015) Free listing as a Tool for Assessing Cognitive Realities of Landscape Transformation: A Case Study from Amazonia. In: Isendahl C, Stump D (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Historical Ecology and Applied Archaeology. Online publication, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 1-21

Barbosa JAA, Nobrega VA, Alves RRDN (2011) Hunting practices in the semiarid region of Brazil. Indian Journal of traditional Knowledge10(3): 486-490

Barrios Garcia MN, Ballari SA (2012) Impact of wild boar (Suss crofa) in its introduced and native range: a review. Biological Invasions doi:10.1007/s10530-012-0229-6

Bentley J, Rodriguez G (2001) Honduran folk Entomology. Current Anthropology 42(2):285-300

Benz B, Santana FM, Pineda R, Cevallos J, Robles L, De Niz D (1994) Characterization of mestizo plant use in the Sierra de Manantlan, Jalisco-Colima, Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology 14:23–42

Berlin B (1992) Ethnobiological Classification: principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies.1 ed. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, USA

Berlin B, Kay P (1991) Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution.1 ed. University of California Press, Berkley, USA

Bernard HR (2006) Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches. 4 ed. Alta Mira Press, Oxford, UK

Cabido MR (1985) Las comunidades vegetales de la Pampa de Achala. Sierras de Córdoba, Argentina. Documents Phytosociologiques 9:431-447.

Cabido MR, Funes G, Pucheta E, Vendramini F, Díaz S (1998) A chorological analysis of the mountains form Central Argentina. Is all what we call Sierra Chaco really Chaco? Contribution to the study of the flora and vegetation of the Chaco. Candollea 53(2): 321-331

Cabido M, Zak MR, Cingolani A, Cáceres D, Díaz S (2005) Cambios en la cobertura de la vegetación del centro de Argentina ¿Factores directos o causas subyacentes?. En: La heterogeneidad de la vegetación de los agroecosistemas. Facultad de Agronomía - Universidad de Buenos Aires (ed), Buenos Aires, pp271-300

Cabrera A (1976). Regiones fitogeográficas argentinas. En: Enciclopedia Argentina de Agricultura y Jardinería.2 ed, Editorial ACME, Argentina

Cáceres D (2001) Diagnóstico Socio productivo de Explotaciones de Pequeños Productores Asentados en la Reserva Hídrica Provincial Pampa de Achala. Córdoba. Administración de Parques Nacionales.

Cáceres D (2004) Caracterización socio productiva de los pobladores de la zona Norte de la reserva hídrica provincial de achala. Administración de Parques Nacionales. Buenos Aires, Argentina

Canevari M, Vaccaro O (2007) Guía de mamíferos del Sur de América del Sur. Ed. LOLA, Buenos Aires

Castaneda H, Stepp JR (2007) Ethnoecological importance value (EIV) methodology: assessing the cultural importance of ecosystems as sources of useful plants for the Guaymi people of Costa Rica. Ethnobotany Research and Applications 5:249-257

Cingolani AM, Renison D,Tecco PA, Gurvich DE, Cabido M (2008) Predicting cover types in a mountain range with long evolutionary grazing history: a GIS approach. Journal of Biogeography 35(3):538-551

Descola P (2016) La composición de los mundos: Conversaciones con Pierre Carbonnier. 1ª ed. Capital intelectual, Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos aires, Argentina

Di Rienzo JA, Casanoves F, Balzarini MG, Gonzalez L, Tablada M, Robledo C W (2008) InfoStat, versión 2008, Grupo InfoStat, FCA. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina

Ferriz RA, Baigún CR, Dominino J (2010) Distribution patterns and trophic characteristics of salmonids and native species inhabiting high altitude rivers of Pampa de Achala region, Argentina. Neotropical Ichthyology 8(4):851-860

Galeano G (2000) Forest use at the Pacific Coast of Chocó, Colombia: a quantitative approach. Economic Botany 54:358-376.

García del Valle Y, Naranjo EJ, Caballero J, Martorell C, Ruan-Soto F, Enríquez PL (2015) Cultural significance of wild mammals in mayan and mestizo communities of the Lacandon Rainforest, Chiapas, Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine11:36

González Insuasti MS, Martorell C, Caballero J (2008) Factors that influence the intensity of non-agricultural management of plant resources. Agroforestry Systems 74(1):1-15.

Gosler AG (2017) The Human Factor: Ecological Salience in Ornithology and Ethno-Ornithology. Journal of Ethnobiology 37(4):637-662.

Guber R (2012) La etnografía: método, campo y reflexividad. 1ed Siglo Veintiuno, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Hunn ES (1999) Size as Limiting the Recognition of Biodiversity in Folkbiological Classifications: One of Four Factors Governing the Cultural Recognition of Biological Taxa. In: Medin DL, Atran S (eds) Folkbiology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 47–69

Kujawska M, Zamudio F, Hilgert NI (2012) Honey-based mixtures used in home medicine by non-indigenous population of Misiones, Argentina. Evidence­based Complementary and Alternative Medicine doi: 10.1155/2012/579350

Lucherini M, Merino MJ (2008) Perceptions of human–carnivore conflicts in the high Andes of Argentina. Mountain research and development 28(1):81-85

Ludwig D (2018a) Does Cogniton Still Mater in Ethnobiology?. Ethnobiology Letters 9(2):269-275

Ludwig D (2018b) Revamping the Metaphysics of Ethnobiological Classification. Current Anthropology 59(4):415-438

Ludwig D (2016) Overlapping ontologies and Indigenous knowledge. From integration to ontological self-determination. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 59:36-45

Marchini S (2014) Dimensiones humanas de los conflictos con fauna silvestre: el caso de Brasil. Boletín Alúna 5(1):48-52

Marchini S, Crawshaw PGJr (2015) Human–Wildlife Conflicts in Brazil: A Fast-Growing Issue. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 20(4): 323-328

Martín Crespo MC, Salamanca AB (2007) El muestreo en la investigación cualitativa. Nure Investigación 27 1-4

Martin GJ (1995) Etnobotánica. Manual de métodos. Fondo mundial para la naturaleza. Ed.UNESCO, Royal Botanic Garden, Londres, UK

Medrano C (2014) Zoo-Sociocosmología qom: Seres humanos, animales y sus relaciones en el gran Chaco. Journal de la Société des Américanistes 100(1):225-257

Monroy R, Flores AG (2015) La fauna silvestre con valor de uso en los huertos frutícolas tradicionales de la comunidad indígena de Xoxocotla, Morelos, México. Etnobiología11(1):44-52

Moreira JR, Ferraz KMP, Herrera EA, Macdonald DW (2012) Capybara: biology, use and conservation of an exceptional neotropical species. ed Springer Science & Business Media, New York, USA

Narosky T, Yzurieta D (2010) Guía de identificación de aves de Argentina y Uruguay. Mazzini Editores, Buenos Aires

Nolan JM, Katlin EJ, Mcdougal KW, McfarlinMJ, Ward MK (2006) The lovable, the loathsome, and the liminal: emotionality in ethnozoological cognition. Journal of Ethnobiology 26(1):126-138

Nolan JM, Robbins MCE (2001) Emotional meaning and the cognitive organization of ethnozoological domains. Journal of Linguist Anthropology11(2):240–249

Pieroni A (2001) Evaluation of the cultural significance of wild food botanicals consumed in north-western Tuscany, Italy. Journal of Ethnobiology 21:89-104

Punta AI, Díaz D, García A, González W, Ilanes C, Losada Weht R, Ludueña M, Martinez O, Oviedo Negro A, Tello G (2014) Voces de Achala. Recuperando historias.1 ed Centro Cultural Graciela Carena, Córdoba, Argentina

Quinlan M (2005). Considerations for collecting freelists in the field: examples from ethobotany. Field methods 17(3):219-234

Quinlan MB, Quinlan RJ (2007) Modernization and medicinal plant knowledge in a Caribbean horticultural village. Medical AnthropologyQuarterly 21(2):169-192

Quiroga VA, Noss AJ, Paviolo A, BoaglioGI, Di Bitetti MS (2016) Puma density, habitat use and conflict with humans in the Argentine Chaco. Journal for Nature Conservation 31:9–15

Renison D, Cingolani AM, Schinner D (2002) Optimizing restoration of Polylepis australis woodlands: when, where and how to transplant seedlings to the mountains. Ecotropica 8:219-224

Reyes García V, Huanca T, Vadez V, Leonard WR, Wilkie D (2006) Cultural, practical and economic value of wild plants: a quantitative study in the bolivian amazon. Economic Botany 60:62-74

Reyes García V, Vadez V, Huanca T, Leonard W, Wilkie D (2005) Knowledge and consumption of wild plants: a comparative study in two Tsimane’ villages in the Bolivian Amazon. Ethnobotany Research y Applications 3:201-208

Rival L (2018) Comment on Ludwig “Revamping the Metaphysics of Ethnobiological Classification”. Current Anthropology 59:415–438

Rival L (2016) Botanical ontologies special section of the Journal of Ethnobiology Post-Face. Journal of Ethnobiology 36(1):147–149

Rosch E, Mervis CB (1975) Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories. Cognitive Psychology 7(4): 573-605

Rosch E, Mervis CB, Gray WD, Johnson DM, Boyes-Braem P (1976) Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive psychology 8(3):382-439

Ryan S (2004) Pobreza y desarrollo rural: la implementación del Programa Social Agropecuario en la región de Pampa de Achala. Dissertation, I Jornadas de Estudios Agrarios y Agroindustriales de la Región NOA, Salta, Argentina

Silva-Rodríguez EA, Soto-Gamboa M, Ortega-Solís GR, Jiménez JE (2009) Foxes, people and hens: human dimensions of a conflict in a rural area of southern Chile. Revista chilena de historia natural 82(3):375-386

Soares de Melo RS, Da Silva OC, Souto A, Alves, RRN, Schiel N (2014) The role of mammals in local communities living in conservation areas in the Northeast of Brazil: an ethnozoological approach. Tropical Conservation Science 7(3):423-439

SOLAE Ethics Committee, Medinaceli A, Cano EJ, Argueta A, Sanabria OL (2018) Latin American Society of Ethnobiology’s Code of Ethics.Ethnobiology Letters 9(1):86–89

Sutrop U (2001) List task and a cognitive salience index. Field Methods13: 263-276

Tamburini DM (2016) La fauna silvestre en las estrategias de reproducción social de los campesinos del Chaco Seco de la Provincia de Córdoba (Argentina). Phd thesis, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina

Torres R, Tamburini D (2018) Mamíferos de Córdoba y su estado de Conservación. 1° Edición. Editorial de la UNC. Córdoba. Argentina

Ulicsni V, Svanberg I, Molnár Z (2013) Folk knowledge of non-domestic mammals among ethnic Hungarians in North-Western Romania. North-Western Journal of Zoology 9(2):383-398

Villar P (2015) El lugar del Puma. Representaciones sociales y cultura material en el valle del cajón (Catamarca, Argentina). KULA. Antropólogos del Atlántico sur 12:30-40

Weller SC, Romney, AK (1988) Systematic data collection. 10 ed. Sage publications, California, USA

Zamudio F, Kujawska M, Hilgert NI. (2010) Honey as Medicinal and Food

Resource. comparison between Polish and Multiethnic Settlements of the Atlantic Forest, Misiones, Argentina. Open Complementary Medicine Journal 2:58-73

Zamudio F, Hilgert NI (2018) Can psychological, emotional and cultural factors influence the cultural significance and knowledge of stingless bees in northern Misiones, Argentina?. In: Patricia V, Silvia RM, Roubik PD (eds) Pot-Pollen, a legacy of stingless bees. Ed. Springer, New York, USA

Zamudio F, Hilgert NI (2015) Multi-dimensionality and variability in folk classification of stingless bees (Apidae: Meliponini). Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine 11(1): 41

Downloads

Published

07/31/2019

How to Cite

Wajner, M., Tamburini, D., & Zamudio, F. (2019). Ethnozoology in the mountains. What does the cognitive salience of wild animals tell us?. Ethnobiology and Conservation, 8. Retrieved from https://www.ethnobioconservation.com/index.php/ebc/article/view/299

Issue

Section

Original research article